Philosophy
We are neutral, not buyer-first or seller-first.
The arbiter's only question is: what was promised, and was a good-faith
attempt made to deliver it? We don't reward the louder party, the
longer-standing party, or the one with more followers. We reward what both
sides put in writing before payment: the listing and the order conversation.
Two rules sit at the top of everything below:
-
Vagueness counts against the party that wrote it.
If a listing promises "a high quality image" and the buyer disputes
the quality, vagueness lands on the seller. If a buyer asks for
"an 8K photorealistic render" and the seller delivers exactly that,
the buyer cannot later argue it was "not what they meant." Write
the specifics you care about.
-
Only on-platform evidence counts. Discord DMs,
Twitter replies, emails, side agreements: none of it counts. If the
promise isn't in the listing or in the order conversation, the
arbiter cannot consider it.
Every outcome is all-or-nothing: the escrowed payment goes to one
side in full. Where the published rules don't yet cover a situation,
the arbiter rules for one side and publishes a rule update so the
next person in the same situation has clarity.